Decision in process plos one
In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. It has broken all the rules. Cell fate decision may not be a programmed event We'll be right back! We're performing scheduled maintenance on our websites, please check back soon! decision-making study involving a sample of healthy young adults. A problem at PLoS ONE and re-start at another journal. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of a sequential pneumococcal vaccination program for adults in Germany. Using the article-editor associations, we develop editor-specific measures of power, activity, article acceptance time, citation impact, and editorial renumeration (an analogue to self-citation). Winkler ,LouisL. TRY IT: Take our quiz, Is it a Competing Interest? and register for a chance to win one of 5 PLOS t-shirts You’re invited to review a manuscript in your area of expertise. For a complete guide how to prepare your manuscript refer to the journal's instructions to authors. This video shows PLOS ONE Editorial Board Members how to submit a decision on a manuscript in the Editorial Manager (EM) submission system. PLoS ONE has retracted a meta-analysis on mindfulness after determining that the authors used dubious methodology and failed to adequately report their financial interest in the psychological treatment the article found effective.
PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, PLOS ONE has a median time-to-publication of around six months; PeerJ’s median time to first decision is 24 days; time to final acceptance is a mere 51 days. The main reason is that I sent it to a different outlet (with a much lower IF than PLoS ONE) only to wait 13 months(!) for the editor’s INITIAL decision that it would not be of enough interest to their readers. PeerJ — the Journal of Life and Environmental Sciences is a peer-reviewed & Open Access journal publishing primary research and reviews in biology, life sciences, environmental sciences, and medicine. Zobrazí-li se tato zpráva, znamená to, že prohlížeč nebo editor nepodporuje soubory webových archivů. By the same token, there is little evidence that patients’ expectation is a non-factor in doctors’ decision making process. Voluntary submission of study results and discussion of the implications of metabolomic data to the development process should be routinely considered and encouraged. - PAI - Policy Analysis Inc. Papers submitted to PLOS Biology will be handled with our standard process, with additional input and curation from the Guest Editors. Bush administration, wrote in a Op-Ed for The Hill that siding with the PLO in this case would not help advance the peace process One is to refine our ability to combine the contributions of "subject-matter" and "process" experts in designing and conducting educational programs. Kuchenbecker U, Chase D, Reichert A, Schiffner-Rohe J, Atwood M.
” When the decision is final, authors will receive the notification by email and see the decision term in the submission system. First of all, it’s okay to decline the invitation. Of the 255 journals that rendered decisions, 157 accepted the paper, most with no discernible sign of having actually carried out peer review. Why? Rather than having to prove to your reviewers the significance of your findings, you just have to prove that the underlying science is sound. About PLOS ONE: PLOS ONE is the first journal of primary research from all areas of science to employ a combination of peer review and post-publication rating and commenting, to maximize the “Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. Especially for being a public access journal. The journal focuses on sharing data and information to support evidence-based practice. Stewart1, William R. After this, acceptance followed without a new round of peer review. At PLOS, we are constantly looking for innovative ways to open up scientific communication—to make it faster, more efficient, more connected and more useful than ever before.
This manuscript was the first scientific performance study of loofa sponge in the engineering Having written previously about journal acceptance to publication times, it is high time I looked at the other important time that affects publication speed: submission to first decision time. USA and UK A problem at PLoS ONE. As long as this process of ethical decision-making is neglected, operational decisions might be made in a discriminatory way, potentially skewing assessments and affecting programmatic outcomes. The Academic Editor’s decision is based on the reviewers’ comments as well as the PLOS ONE Criteria for Publication and the editor’s own assessment of the manuscript. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. He determined that only a small proportion of papers had received comments (18% of PLOS ONE articles, and just 2% of BMC articles). Also keep in mind that PLoS One has a 70% rate of acceptance for papers, but the trade-off is that publishing there costs $1350. PLOS ONE May 10, 2019. In the clinical validation and qualification process, every effort should be made to choose biomarkers with the greatest specificity and sensitivity, and, hence, predictive value. Rev #2: “This is a great revision.
PLoS ONE features reports of primary research from all disciplines within science and medicine. Open interviews were conducted with 21 older hospitalised patients and/or their next of kin about the decision-making process leading to hospitalisation. When reviewers disagree, the decision is not necessarily made according to majority rule. James Glassman, a top State Department official in the George W. Impact Factor of PLoS One, 1932-6203, Journal Impact Factor report There has been considerable recent interest in using Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the molecular basis of decision-making behavior. Abstract: We analyzed the longitudinal activity of nearly 7,000 editors at the mega-journal PLOS ONE over the 10-year period 2006-2015. Each author should have made real and concrete contributions. Rice1 1 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. …and then we hit another immensely frustrating hurdle (entirely out of PLOS ONE’s control). When all required modiﬁcations have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.
The tell-tale sign for brain damage, in human brains at least, is the build MIME-Version: 1. Participants selected cards from one of two decks and were rewarded with variable point rewards exchanged for money at the end of the experiment [25,26]. To a non-scientist like me, who previously trusted and had respect for the integrity of Peer reviewed Scientific Journals such as PLOS One, to now witness their failure to uphold their own publication standards is very disappointing. sem@cuw. As I explained in the previous post, the time from submission to publication in a peer reviewed journal can be split into three phases, the two […] To answer your question, publishing in PLOS ONE is not career suicide. Gorgolewski4, Michael The process includes "an option at acceptance for authors to decide whether to publish the full peer review history alongside their work. 4,147 likes · 49 talking about this. PLOS accelerates progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication. If the JME submission status is "Decision in Process", how long does it take The aim of this qualitative study was to gain insight into how the decision to hospitalise was made from the perspective of the older patient who was unplanned admitted to hospital. MAMP-IVCW coupling process based on loofa sponge material in micro-polluted water treatment”, and hope it meet the submission requirements on PLOS ONE.
After much consideration and a full review of the platform, we have made the difficult decision to cease publication of PLOS Currents. Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. Finally March 14th we get a decision…but wait it went out for review all over again!!! CC: daniel. 1. Process management and optimization to Plos One Instructions Authors Figures PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. More specifically, whether stress leads to more habitual behaviors by either selectively weakening the process of goal-directed behaviors, by merely strengthening the PLoS ONE, as you know, covers just about all aspects of science! So multiply my subfield by all the other subfields (I can get to 20 easy without even leaving “biomedical” as the supergroup) with their respective journals and…. Jacobs RoyM 2017-07-15 plos one 没送外审直接decision in pro 2; 2015-07-08 plosone大修返回后decison in process 2015-04-14 最近plos one decision in process 2017-06-04 最近plos one decision in process 2017-01-01 最近plos one decision in process 2017-06-23 plosone从投稿到online大概需要多长时间; 2015-06-28 plos one 2017-08-25 最近plos one decision in process 2017-07-15 plos one 没送外审直接decision in pro 1; 2015-07-08 plosone大修返回后decison in process 2017-01-01 最近plos one decision in process 2015-04-14 最近plos one decision in process 2017-06-23 plosone从投稿到online大概需要多长时间 The eighty five groups in the consultative condition received the instruction to approach the task by employing the method of group leader, which means that each group member must provide input to the appointed group leader who then decides on the PLOS ONE | www. JME submission status: "Decision in Process". The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has determined that the evidence is sufficient to add a lung cancer screening counseling and shared decision making visit, and for appropriate beneficiaries, annual screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT), as an additional preventive service benefit under the Medicare program only if all of the following criteria are Significantly faster than PLOS ONE (3x) and Scientific Reports (2x). ).
I have no idea. 3) Academic Editor Assignment. Aligned with our founding mission, we aim to be as fast as PLOS Currents no longer accepts new submissions. My PLoS-ONE Academic Editor Activity Summary By Iddo on July 18th, 2014 . Over one-half of all recurrent episodes of acute uncomplicated cystitis are caused by the same bacterial strain as the initial infection [11,12]. 0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C86CA3. The final decision on a manuscript is made by the Academic Editor. One of the coauthors works in the same department as you do, and although you aren’t collaborating on any projects at the moment, you are friendly. e. PLoS ONE 2013.
It should also be pointed out that PLOS One has over 4000 academic editors, and this problem, though it should be taken seriously, is limited to a very small minority. Our innovative peer-review system helps you, your editor, and your reviewers work faster and smarter. A manuscript from my lab is under consideration at a PLOS journal that is one of the top journals in my field. plos one 外审三个多月后从under review状态直接变到Decision in Process，Decision in Process持续了一个月还没变化，在系统内发邮件给编辑了一个多星期也没回，请问什么情况。 哎，本人在PLOS ONE 投了一篇META分析的文章，从投稿到现在大概有2. all of a sudden the PLoS ONE output doesn’t look so large. The paper came back from the first round of review with a decision of major revisions, and we sent it back after addressing most of the reviewer concerns. We often keep the two separate. § This is a gimmick. Here, we If one followed this process, then one would realize that: - None of the three reviewers has any remaining objection about results, methods, or clarity of the text. I really don't see any compelling reason why I would choose to send a paper to Scientific Reports over PLoS ONE.
plosone. On the contrary, appraisal of internal validity plays one of the most prominent roles in systematic reviews. Search for: Futurity is your source of research news from leading universities. Learning and decision-making aren't separate processes in the brain, new research shows. Read this article to understand peer review and editorial decision-making process in detail. Address: Public Library of Science (PLOS) Salerno, J, Bottoms, BL & Peter-Hagene, LC 2017, ' Individual versus group decision making: Jurors’ reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony ' PLoS One, vol. 5月了，期间经历了under review,required reviews completed,到现在的decision in process。 plos one 直接从under review 到了Decision in Process 什么意思 +关注. This package includes the editor’s full decision letter, complete with reviewer comments and authors’ responses for each revision of the manuscript. Deciding where to place eggs is likely one of the most important decisions for a female fly, as eggs are vulnerable and larvae have limited motility. The process of Section Editor assignment normally takes 1-2 days, although sometimes one of the PLoS staff editors may wish to discuss the paper internally at this stage before proceeding with the review.
This is a short guide how to format citations and the bibliography in a manuscript for PLOS ONE. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. edu PONE-D-12-34738R1 Enhancing Hit Identification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Discovery Using Validated Dual-Event Bayesian Models PLOS ONE Dear Dr. As with initial UTIs, it is What is the editorial review process at PLoS Genetics? it is assigned to one of our senior editors—comprising the Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editors, and Section RESEARCH ARTICLE Decoding brain activity using a large-scale probabilistic functional-anatom ical atlas of human cognition Timothy N. Journal description. Here’s the official definition that PLOS uses: A competing interest is anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to PLOS. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. How to format your references using the PLOS ONE citation style. Some Reminders. 还没有给我修改意见，直接就到了Decision in process, 这种是不是 RESEARCHARTICLE A new basal ornithopod (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Early Cretaceous of Texas KateA.
Similarly Others have questioned whether PLOS ONE’s massive editorial challenge — publishing more than 30,000 articles — raises the chances that mistakes will happen. Each author should have made real and concrete contributions to the If you experience any issues with your figures, please watch this short video. org 0601 Stage 1: Sourcing the Evidence Evidence-informed policymaking sees the use of different types of information in a variety of forms and from a variety of sources, reﬂ ective of, and responsive to, the policy and practice context. Manuscript 30 Peer Review Procedures Overview: All manuscripts submitted to PLOS ONE are subject to rigorous review. Shared Treatment Decision Making (TDM) is the process through which patients, physicians, and family members become involved to decide medical treatment, through sharing information, expressing treatment preferences, and agreeing on how to implement the proposed treatment plan . article metrics). I recently received an email from PLoS-ONE summarizing my editorial activity for the first half of 2014. Fear that a relative could experience extreme hunger or thirst if they are not mechanically fed tends to be the main driver behind family's requests to implement artificial or enteral feeding methods. The problem is just more detectable at PLOS One because of the laudable process of indicating who was the academic editor for a published paper. Updated June 2013 - Many of you reach this page searching for the impact factor of Scientific Reports.
The time to receive a decision depends on how long it takes for the editor to assess the reviews. The review process was smooth and fast, and the editorial staff is very helpful during the production phase (they added in text for me, etc. In the US, an estimated one-third of nursing home patients with a severe cognitive impairment have artificial feeding tubes inserted. Hope someone sheds some light. Check out this 14-item tool to assess transparency of the peer review process at an unfamiliar journal to indicate the quality of their peer review process. PLOS ONE publishes its papers under a Creative Commons licence (to its immense credit again). PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission of leading a transformation in scientific and medical research communication. This finding suggests that the Australian trapdoor spider may have crossed the ocean from Africa rather than being the product of geographical separation. To learn more about serving as an editor for PLOS ONE PLOS ONE. Hi, this post has enforced my decision to submit my paper to PLoS ONE.
The question is still open as to whether it is the right venue for my paper, but since March 6 it has received 409 unique views. While the Academic Editor is entering the decision, authors may see the status “Decision in Process. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. 2) to sodium phosphate saline (pH 7. We foresee more transparent ways to discuss and assess work over the entire lifetime of the research. Currently, the PLOS ONE article processing charge is $1,595 and the Collection Surcharge is $500, totaling to $2,095. The journal published 6,700 articles in 2010 and will publish around 12,000 in 2011. One reason for this situation may be that managers in charge of humanitarian operations are unlikely to be trained in ethics. To its credit, PLOS ONE accepted our arguments and did not hold us to the Formal Comment process. BMJ 2010.
PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology and PLOS Computational Biology are delighted to announce a Call for Papers in Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease Dynamics, where submissions will be included in a Collection bringing together different disciplines such as mathematics, biology, medicine and physics in order to shed light on this crucial topic Competing interests can be many things. Decision time immediate rejection: 17 days: compare → Characteristics of peer review process The editor of PLoS ONE has not yet provided information for this page. Sample 4 was drawn from a To its credit, PLOS ONE accepted our arguments and did not hold us to the Formal Comment process. We no longer accept new submissions to the journal. I think PLoS One is a terrific journal and has a very high impact factor. Decision process. All journals are peer reviewed, featuring quality research, expert commentary and critical analysis. Introduction. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science. Nursing Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of nursing and midwifery.
We publish five days a week to ensure no further delays in the publishing process. The results PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional journals. and re-start at another journal. One of the critical issues regarding the relationship between stress and decision-making is how stress has an impact on the trade-off between habit and goal-directed behaviors. I published there once, and many other people with thriving careers have also published there (often on numerous occasions), so clearly it isn’t career suicide. SEM micrographs of microspheres cross-linked with alginate and hyaluronate. Empirical Evidence for Son-Killing X Chromosomes and the Operation of SA-Zygotic Drive Urban Friberg1,2*, Andrew D. Enhancing the decision-making process when considering artificial nutrition in advanced dementia care. 12, no. BABD5B20" Tento dokument je webová stránka tvořená jedním souborem, rovněž nazývaná soubor webového archivu.
The manuscript was submitted in August, after queries, the journal staff assured that the manuscript was going out for peer review, then after a month and a half, the manuscript was rejected within a day of being viewed by a subject PLOS ONE is a large and complex journal, so we are constantly striving to ensure that publishing in PLOS ONE is a smooth process that provides a great service to all our authors and readers, and we are presently working on improving our internal workflows. Defining an information-using equilibrium as one where the receiver makes use of informative signals to guide behavior, the Mario is an Associate Professor and Head of Division at the Division of Structural Engineering, he works in the research group Concrete Structures at Chalmers. - Reviewer #2 and #3 have an overall very positive assessment of the paper and in particular of its interest. A mixed blocked/event-related design was used to analyze the data. Ekins, In the end, I am very happy with our decision to publish in PLoS ONE. org Figure 1. Claims of speed can be used to carve out a competitive edge, especially for journals serving authors. 4), and the accumulated exenatide PLOS ONE | www. PLoS One 2018;13(5):e0197905. Authors of articles under review at PLOS Currents have been contacted by the journal office.
Plos One Instructions Authors PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. PLoS ONE, as you know, covers just about all aspects of science! So multiply my subfield by all the other subfields (I can get to 20 easy without even leaving “biomedical” as the supergroup) with their respective journals and…. plosmedicine. PLOS is delighted to launch the PLOS Crops, Food Security & Food Systems Channel with our Channel Editors – distinguished scientific experts in their field – to hand curate the latest and most impactful research in crop science and food systems to better understand their implications for food security. Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals Wicherts, JM. We also need to focus on providing a strong support for our editorial board. In a small noise limit, we derive a general equation for the decision boundary that locally relates its curvature to the probability distribution of inputs. Rubin1,2☯, Oluwasanmi Koyejo3,4, Krzysztof J. Authors are encouraged to use their own voice and to Authors are responsible for any fees or expenses in regards to the PLOS ONE/PLOS Computational Biology Collection publication of their paper. 5 after 1 h switching from HCl solution (pH 1.
PLoS Medicine | www. Using reference management software A first decision of 30 -35 days at PLOS ONE should not include any desk rejected papers because PLOS ONE's mantra is that importance/impact/sexiness does not matter - all that matters is whether or not the methodology is sound. chance of recurrence within one year  despite appro-priate therapy of the initial infection and negative follow-up urine cultures. 5 h, the swelling ratio was around 3. We look promote free market capitalism by identifying its real life According to the ever popular journal Plos One, a team of scientists, led by Peter Cummings, from Boston University School of Medicine, carried out some research into the brains of woodpeckers, using exhibits from the Field Museum and Harvard Museum of Natural History. The peer review of each manuscript is handled by one of our editorial board members, who acts as the AE. Is it a competing It is similarly priced (until January 2012) as PLoS ONE and has less author feedback information (i. Health care providers explain treatments and alternatives to patients and help them choose the treatment option that best aligns with their preferences as well as their unique cultural and personal beliefs. I've never submitted a paper to PLOS ONE but I presume they send out any legitimate manuscript for review. For more information please see the PLOS ONE Editorial and Peer Review Information page or the PLOS Biology Editor and Peer Review Information page, as relevant.
Types of evidence that inform the policy process can Kuchenbecker U, Chase D, Reichert A, Schiffner-Rohe J, Atwood M. Hi there, great post, thanks for all the info. And apparently authors love PLoS One, because they are sending us lots of paper. the decision to send it to PLoS. (PLOS ONE, rejected the paper, and was one of the few to flag its ethical flaws). One possibility I can think of is that the Editor needs to write his letter, which can take him days/weeks if he has too many of these "Decision in Process" items pending in his list. This review consists of the following steps: Initial submissions are reviewed by internal staff to ensure adherence to PLOS ONE policies, including ethical requirements for human and animal experimentation. It is a tax-exempt, 501(c)3, nonprofit corporation headquartered in San Francisco, California. That’s a good thing: for one, I’m terrible at keeping track of all my service activities, and this helps in keeping them straight for my own annual activities Getting to grips with the process of decision-making in long-term care. The latest Tweets from PLOS (@PLOS).
You do not have to say yes to everything! Shared decision-making in medicine (SDM) is a process in which both the patient and physician contribute to the medical decision-making process. PLOS publishes a suite of Open Access journals across all areas of science and medicine: PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Medicine, PLOS Computational Biology, PLOS Genetics, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases and PLOS Pathogens. How long for a decision? Economist 01c3. This has clearly caught the attention of lots of established publishers, as the past year has seen the launch of a series of PLoS One clones, including: For more information about PLOS ONE relevant to journalists, bloggers and press officers, including details of our press release process and our embargo policy, see the everyONE blog at http Plos One Author Instructions PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. . the stated intent of PLoS ONE should help to shortcut this process. Publication will just be one chapter in the life of an article. I’ve been thinking of making a website where authors enter their own data on peer review time for different journals, to get a big data-set on this that could help authors choose the quicker journals when they want a quick decision on a paper. (Remember the paper that cited “ the Creator? ”) As David Crotty wrote in March in Scholarly Kitchen: …what about editorial decision-making? PLOS ONE has some 6,100 editors We could find only two blog posts by Euan Adie, in 2008 and 2009, that examined commenting rates and the nature of comments left on articles published by BioMed Central (BMC) and PLOS ONE. 9, e0183580.
This video shows PLOS ONE peer reviewers how to submit a review in Editorial Manager (EM). Motivation: The Plos ONE review process has been the worst review process of any journal I've publish in to date. The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. Subject-matter education often fails to include the provision of process skills in leadership or policy making, while pro- common interest, one that is more demanding in its classification of a case as one of zero common interest, and find that informative signaling with zero common interest is possible in this stronger sense as well. 求助各位高人，我的plos one 经历了一次大修，一次小修，现在是decision in process的状态已经持续4天了，请问这个正常吗？一般都需要等多长时间啊？ 我的这个小修的时候编辑就说“we feel that your manuscript will likely be suitable for publication if it is revised to address the points However, this being Plos One, it is possible that the paper had been reviewed for another Plos journal, rejected with positive reviews on significance grounds, and had those reviews transferred to Plos One. Article in BMJ Detering KM et al. s decision or do we ask for an Available systematic reviews generally do not assess available evidence from a CER perspective – in other words, to examine the extent to which published trials are relevant to clinical and health policy decision making. AndrzejewskiID* ☯,DaleA. Isabel Mulhern Editorial Manager at PLOS ONE San Francisco, California Developed business intelligence strategy to drive data based decision making. However, in a recent PLOS ONE study scientists confirmed that this arthropod belongs to an otherwise African genus.
org Decision Rules and Group Rationality Americans For Capitalism, Detroit, Michigan. Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) researchers have found that decision-making accuracy can be improved by postponing the onset of a decision by a mere fraction of a second. In the group of microspheres cross-linked for 0. Our motivation comes from the nervous system, where neurons process multidimensional signals into a binary sequence of responses (spikes). Thank you again to the authors of the above letter and to Tom Kindlon for his invaluable work. Descriptive cases illustrate the chaotic reality of the construction of preferences Added 22 hours ago This guide walks you through the process of responding to an invitation and provides quick tips for getting ready to do the review once you’ve accepted the invitation. For information on and best practices on writing a peer review visit the PLOS Reviewer Center (http At PLOS ONE we like to speed up the publication process wherever we can. This is a good question. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLoS ONE facilitates the Announcing the launch of the PLOS Crops, Food Security & Food Systems Channel. decision in process plos one